PDA

View Full Version : Major study of PPCM proposal


JAMESFETT
08-22-2008, 09:15 AM
An important proposal for comprehensive study of PPCM in 12 major USA medical centers has been submitted, Let us hope and pray that funding will be forthcoming so that the much-needed study can begin. This brings together all the important body of knowledge that has accumulated since 2000 about PPCM. There is definitely progress. Kudos also to AMH.org (see P.S.)

PROGRAM INTRODUCTION AND STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES
Peripartum Cardiomyopathy and Myocarditis Consortium (PCMC): This Rare Disease Clinical Research Network (RDCRN) proposal will establish a Peripartum Cardiomyopathy and Myocarditis Consortium (PCMC) to advance clinical research and improve clinical care for two important but rare disorders which initiate the pathogenesis of non-ischemic cardiomyopathy: peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) and inflammatory myocarditis. Though theoretically initiated by different factors, maternal-fetal interactions in PPCM (Pearson, JAMA, 2000) and viral infections in myocarditis (Feldman et al. NEJM, 2000), these disorders share a common immune pathogenesis which results in myocardial injury and left ventricular dysfunction. Dramatic myocardial recovery is frequently evident in both PPCM and myocarditis; however, those subjects who do not recover are left with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), a disease which progresses over time and leads to cardiac
transplantation or death. Research into the pathogenesis of both disorders has been limited by their infrequent occurrence at most individual referral centers. In addition, the inability to predict which subjects will recover makes clinical trials of therapeutic innovation difficult. The PCMC will bring together 12 major centers of clinical care and research in heart failure to further understanding of pathogenesis and optimize and improve current standards of clinical care. In addition through
investigation of novel transcriptome-based biomarkers (TBB), the network proposal seeks to improve our ability to predict recovery and set the stage for future interventional trials in those subjects who will not recover with current therapeutics.

Aim 1: Establish a multi-center Peripartum Cardiomyopathy and Myocarditis Consortium (PCMC) to foster and facilitate clinical investigation in peripartum cardiomyopathy and acute myocarditis. The network incorporates twelve major U.S. heart failure clinical research centers (University of Pittsburgh, Mayo Clinic, Cleveland Clinic, Massachusetts General Hospital, Johns Hopkins, University of Rochester, University of Texas Southwestern, Penn State Medical Center, Thomas Jefferson Medical College, University of Miami, Baylor Children’s and UCLA), and will combine their clinical and research expertise with the resources of Clinical Translational Science Institutes at seven sites to form the core of the consortium. The PCMC would serve as the focal point for research in both acute peripartum cardiomyopathy and the related disorders of acute inflammatory myocarditis. To achieve this aim, the following activities are proposed: A) Develop a clinical data
repository in collaboration with other Rare Disease Clinical Research Consortia and the Rare Disease Data and Technology Coordinating Center. B) Build a clinical specimen bank for storage of serum, plasma, DNA, and tissue samples linked to the clinical data repository. C) Enact a national recruitment program in cooperation with patient advocacy groups. D) Utilize the extensive resources of the Clinical Translational Science Institutes at seven of the consortium sites.

Aim 2: Conduct longitudinal studies of the immune etiology of PPCM and of viral etiologies of acute myocarditis and their relationship to myocardial recovery and clinical outcomes. These longitudinal investigations will utilize the multi-center network to further the understanding of their pathogenesis, and will develop novel biomarkers of inflammatory disease activity. Utilizing the consortium Clinical Data Repository and Clinical Specimen Bank and in coordination with biostatistical support from the Data and Technology Coordinating Center, the Consortium Biomarkers Project will use several promising techniques to develop new markers of disease activity. This program will establish a framework for testing of future novel biomarkers by investigators both within and beyond the consortium.

JD

P.S. The proposal also identifies AMH.org as participants in this project, as follows:

Collaborative Arrangements with Patient Support Organizations:
The PCMC will work together with important patient advocacy groups, “A Mothers Heart (PPCM, Ms. Serena Welsh, CEO, Dr. James Fett, medical advisor) and the Myocarditis Foundation (myocarditis, Ms. Candace Moose, Secretary and Treasurer, Dr Leslie Cooper, Medical Director. Both advocacy groups have expressed their support for the proposed network and their willingness to work together toward mutual goals. Both “A Mothers Heart” and the “Myocarditis Foundation” maintain active web sites which each receive several million “hits” each year. These web sites will be “linked” in a bidirectional manner to allow patients hitting the web sites to gain access to the consortium web sites and vice versa. In addition, a consistent concern among patients with these rare disorders is the lack of physician awareness as to the appropriate diagnostic workup, therapy and outcomes. Educating physicians about the state of the art of diagnosis and treatment of PPCM and myocarditis will be an important mutual goal of the consortium. An education committee made up from the leadership of patient advocacy groups and the leadership of the consortium will be established to review education goals and materials. The leadership of the consortium will work closely with the leadership of “A Mothers Heart” and “The Myocarditis Foundation” to improve access to care, education of subjects with these disorders and their physicians, and to develop web based tools for bidirectional communication.

Erin
08-22-2008, 12:36 PM
This is so exciting. Does this proposal go before NIH? Anything we can do (letters, etc.) that may help to get it funded?

Stephanie'sbigheart
08-22-2008, 12:40 PM
Great news Dr. Fett!

JAMESFETT
08-22-2008, 01:58 PM
As I understand this proposal, it comes about in response to the United States Public Health Service call for research proposals for investigation of "rare diseases" including PPCM and fulminant myocaridits, including giant cell myocarditis. Hence, the initials, PCMC, standing for Peripartum Cardiomyopathy and Myocarditis Consortium." The funding would come from the US government. If this funding is not approved, another proposal would probably be submitted to the umbrella of National Institution of Health programs. Hope and pray for success. It will take about 6 months or so, I think, for an answer to come. Any waiting is too long, so far as I am concerned, but we are talking about multi-millions $$. AMH.org has done a lot already by providing important patient data, and by committing to help this project in any ways it can.

JD

Erin
08-22-2008, 03:48 PM
USPHS -- Does that fall under Mike Leavitt's umbrella? (Secretary of Health and Human Services)

I'll definitely be hoping and praying.

JAMESFETT
08-22-2008, 04:41 PM
USPHS is mostly under DHHS, but Commissioned Officers of USPHS are paid by Department of Defense, since they are in a uniformed service (but not an armed service).

Aidansmom
08-22-2008, 07:30 PM
... I can't stress how important it is to include letters of support from participating organizations like AMH in Federal grant applications. It makes all of the difference in the world, adding both assurance of project feasability and a human element to the research topic/question at hand. Bravo to AMH for providing this tangible support, and thank you Dr. Fett for letting us know about this. If I can be of any assistance, please let me know (I don't work for NIH, but I do know a lot about this process and the arcane world of research grant writing and funding).

Erin
08-22-2008, 08:38 PM
USPHS is mostly under DHHS, but Commissioned Officers of USPHS are paid by Department of Defense, since they are in a uniformed service (but not an armed service).

I used to work with Mike Leavitt when he was Governor. Might that be useful? Or do you think he would be too detached from the situation?

Kate, do you know how or where we could send letters of support?

JAMESFETT
08-22-2008, 09:02 PM
Serena can probably help in this question about where to direct letters of support, emphasizing the importance of AMH.org in advocacy for PPCM patients. Did you see the P.S. in which PCMC emphasizes the importance of educating doctors about the best way to recognize and treat PPCM--a lot of which you find here on this website.

JD

Aidansmom
08-22-2008, 09:05 PM
I used to work with Mike Leavitt when he was Governor. Might that be useful? Or do you think he would be too detached from the situation?

Kate, do you know how or where we could send letters of support?


In the case of my agency, letters of support are usually sent with the applications as attachments. One way to follow up with letters of support after the submission of an application is to contact the agency in question and find out who is managing the peer review process for the research program, and then addressing letters of support directly to that person while referencing the application number, title of proposal, and principal investigator. The identified program manager should be contacted via e-mail or telephone so that they know to expect such a letter, and it is for a particular application.

While letters of support from individuals may be of some use (I don't often receive those), it is optimal to have letters of support from organizations who have pull or resources in terms of membership or credibility. So, I hope AMH sent a letter of pledged support of this project? If not, I can work with you guys to craft such a letter.

JAMESFETT
08-22-2008, 10:25 PM
Yes, Serena has officially sent a letter of support on behalf of AMH.org, and that is why the proposal specifically lists AMH.org as an official advocacy group on behalf of PPCM patients (see original message in this thread). I am a medical consultant for PCMC network, and have had a periodic input into the science of the proposal, as well as being referenced for 3 or 4 articles in the citations. I also provided the Principal Investigator (PI), Dennis McNamara, MD, U Pitt, with contact information for AMH.org.

Your suggestion about letters to the reviewers now that the proposal has been submitted seems good, maybe Serena can provide the names for receipt of such letters by inquiry to Dr. McNamara?

Aidansmom
08-22-2008, 10:54 PM
Your suggestion about letters to the reviewers now that the proposal has been submitted seems good, maybe Serena can provide the names for receipt of such letters by inquiry to Dr. McNamara?[/QUOTE]

Hi Dr. Fett,

If Dr. McNamara can tell you who the program manager is at United States Public Health Service is who is handling this application process, all letters can be addressed to that person. That person should also be contacted in advance to alert them to expect letters in support of this particular application. I don't want to volunteer anyone on their behalf, but Serena would be the obvious choice to make that call, and I would suggest taking a tally of people on AMH who would be willing to write letters of support so that she can advise the program manager on how many to expect. I can also provide template of a typical letter of support.

JAMESFETT
08-23-2008, 09:21 AM
Thank you, Kate. I don't know any of the details about the funding, and I think any efforts at encouraging further support should come from the membership and leadership of AMH.org, and not from me as a scientific consultant to PCMC. I think I would also like to hear from Serena about the best strategy to follow on this. Your expertise and enthusiasm about this are truly appreciated, and you may want to contact Serena. Best wishes and thanks.

JD

SerenaWelsh
08-23-2008, 12:53 PM
Hi all. Not ignoring. I am researching the who and the where currently and will update (very loudly) as soon as I have some concerete information.

Thanks,


Kate - I definately want to pick your brain!

Aidansmom
08-23-2008, 02:25 PM
Happy to help and am at your service. :) I'm happy to send you my personal e-mail and phone number if that would be easier.

SerenaWelsh
08-23-2008, 07:54 PM
Kate, that would be very helpful. Thank you!
serenawelsh@earthlink.net

Erin
11-04-2008, 12:40 PM
Any news yet from Dr. McNamara? (Serena, did you ever get emails from Kate and me?)

Still keeping my fingers crossed...

JAMESFETT
11-04-2008, 01:30 PM
The decision about funding is coming in Spring 2009. Still waiting, and that is about all we can do at this time.

JD

Erin
11-04-2008, 01:39 PM
Oh, okay, that's good. Somehow in off-the-board conversations I got the impression a decision was coming sooner, but obviously I just misunderstood. Looking forward to spring, then! Thanks, Dr. Fett.

JAMESFETT
11-04-2008, 02:46 PM
There may be another proposal made by PCMC before Spring, but that would be separate, and that would be sent to some branch of NIH, one of those unsolicited request for funds, not a response to a request for proposal.

JD